Syndechoe, Go Lucky
Hello Dear Reader,
I want to compare two films I viewed recently--Syndechoe New York (SNY) and Happy Go Lucky (HGL).
I'm not going to spend anytime explaining the plot of the movies, for sake of brevity. I will just jump in with the assumption that my fictitious readers of my blog have seen the movies.
On the surface, these films have very little in common. One is a romp about an extremely jubilant personality who lifts herself and others out of the humdrum routine of life and treats every moment as one of adventure, whereas the other is about a man who wallows in self-misery and spends his life analyzing every inch of his being and his existensial suffering over mortality, loneliness, and the whole range of human emotions and cruel randomness of life.
The Universe's also seem different, as HGL is shot in a realistic way with a realistic backdrop, where SNY is as surreal as Bunuel with many elements (the house on fire, the diary etc.)
One film you leave with a smile on your face, the other you leave with a hole in your soul.
Strangely enough, I feel that the two films are of the same coin. I think they are, in fact, grounded in the same universe and are living in the same narrative. This is a cold and uncaring world with no discernible meaning. There is no abstract 'good' to help people through their daily struggles. Instead, randomness and loneliness are the true engines of this world. It is up to individual people to deal with the heart ache and the day-to-day grind of living the same monotonous routine until you die.
In HGL, the protagonist's quest is to bring happiness or laughter to everybody she meets. Sure, it's still a world where child abuse, racism and violence is lurking, but she stands up to this Universe with a smile and fights it. She fights by listening to the homeless, by being light with her friends, by making a broken down clerk smile, by being warm in a frigid, arbitrary world.
In SNY, there is still this world of cancer, loneliness, death, abuse, but here we have a protagonist that doesn't have the strength or know how to stand up to it. Smiling and laughing are not options for Hayden. Instead, he takes his pain, his lonely, his sickly health and puts it on a pedestal. He creates an identity through his loss and through the cruelty of the world around him, and still this isn't enough. He fervently analyzes his life and transfers his pain into art. The only problem is how this does not help him cope. If anything it exasperates his situation, as he has to live his painful moments over and over as his actor makes the same mistakes he just did. Is there any redemption? Not really. The speech by the priest which ends with "Fuck everybody" is as close to catharsis as we get, but there are little moments in the film where we see Hayden in quiet moments where he actually connects with somebody. These are very few, but they show glimpses of hope that life can be more than a soul tearing, quotidian routine of life. And it also examines the pain artists must go through to create something real.
The similarities are evident--both worlds are arbitrary, cold and meaningless; humans ultimately ascribe meaning to the life they are born into. This fundamental choice is what shapes the living narrative and experiences of all our individual worlds. It really is the only choice we have control over: how to act in an unkind world. Crucially, the scenes of joy in these films are ones where in understanding between people is reached and islands unite to form a continent of human warmth that is as important as it is ultimately fleeting.
I want to compare two films I viewed recently--Syndechoe New York (SNY) and Happy Go Lucky (HGL).
I'm not going to spend anytime explaining the plot of the movies, for sake of brevity. I will just jump in with the assumption that my fictitious readers of my blog have seen the movies.
On the surface, these films have very little in common. One is a romp about an extremely jubilant personality who lifts herself and others out of the humdrum routine of life and treats every moment as one of adventure, whereas the other is about a man who wallows in self-misery and spends his life analyzing every inch of his being and his existensial suffering over mortality, loneliness, and the whole range of human emotions and cruel randomness of life.
The Universe's also seem different, as HGL is shot in a realistic way with a realistic backdrop, where SNY is as surreal as Bunuel with many elements (the house on fire, the diary etc.)
One film you leave with a smile on your face, the other you leave with a hole in your soul.
Strangely enough, I feel that the two films are of the same coin. I think they are, in fact, grounded in the same universe and are living in the same narrative. This is a cold and uncaring world with no discernible meaning. There is no abstract 'good' to help people through their daily struggles. Instead, randomness and loneliness are the true engines of this world. It is up to individual people to deal with the heart ache and the day-to-day grind of living the same monotonous routine until you die.
In HGL, the protagonist's quest is to bring happiness or laughter to everybody she meets. Sure, it's still a world where child abuse, racism and violence is lurking, but she stands up to this Universe with a smile and fights it. She fights by listening to the homeless, by being light with her friends, by making a broken down clerk smile, by being warm in a frigid, arbitrary world.
In SNY, there is still this world of cancer, loneliness, death, abuse, but here we have a protagonist that doesn't have the strength or know how to stand up to it. Smiling and laughing are not options for Hayden. Instead, he takes his pain, his lonely, his sickly health and puts it on a pedestal. He creates an identity through his loss and through the cruelty of the world around him, and still this isn't enough. He fervently analyzes his life and transfers his pain into art. The only problem is how this does not help him cope. If anything it exasperates his situation, as he has to live his painful moments over and over as his actor makes the same mistakes he just did. Is there any redemption? Not really. The speech by the priest which ends with "Fuck everybody" is as close to catharsis as we get, but there are little moments in the film where we see Hayden in quiet moments where he actually connects with somebody. These are very few, but they show glimpses of hope that life can be more than a soul tearing, quotidian routine of life. And it also examines the pain artists must go through to create something real.
The similarities are evident--both worlds are arbitrary, cold and meaningless; humans ultimately ascribe meaning to the life they are born into. This fundamental choice is what shapes the living narrative and experiences of all our individual worlds. It really is the only choice we have control over: how to act in an unkind world. Crucially, the scenes of joy in these films are ones where in understanding between people is reached and islands unite to form a continent of human warmth that is as important as it is ultimately fleeting.
